News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:.plan by wink on Wednesday November 17, 2021 @03:44PM (#29258596)
No disagreement here, but this was about flexibility, not an absolute judgement of how far-reaching a protocol must be.

I think I like the idea of a "spec" inside the same "protocol" more. For example if you understand HTTP you can quickly reason about any spec of a REST API that's done with JSON payloads without caring for the HTTP wrapper layer, just as you don't care for TCP around it.

Re:.plan by ay on Thursday November 18, 2021 @03:47AM (#29263447)
tptacek’s original comment was amounting to “finger protocol is strictly worse than http” - which reads quite as an absolute judgement.

Yeah, reusability and layering of engineering knowledge is useful - it makes dealing with complexity easier.

But it also makes it easier to build complexity without spending thinking of a simpler solutions. Because time to market.

And thus we have exhibits at https://mobile.twitter.com/internetofshit