News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The bullet effects in Terminator 2 weren’t CGI by phreeza on Monday November 15, 2021 @10:02AM (#29228187)
It's possible for a policy to result in an net positive even if it entails some individual negative examples.
Re:The bullet effects in Terminator 2 weren’t CGI by baq on Monday November 15, 2021 @11:59AM (#29229555)
it's a given for any policy, but we aren't talking about generalizations here; in the end, it's the particular that matters.
Re:The bullet effects in Terminator 2 weren’t CGI by phreeza on Monday November 15, 2021 @02:10PM (#29231284)
It depends on the alternative you are suggesting. No taxes? A bureaucracy so vast that can handle all imaginable edge cases? Individual discretion of the tax assessor? I think all these could fix this particular problem but might lead to worse outcomes overall.
Re:The bullet effects in Terminator 2 weren’t CGI by baq on Monday November 15, 2021 @02:35PM (#29231631)
i suggested the solution right there - forfeiture of the assets that the taxman can't get the tax for.
Re:The bullet effects in Terminator 2 weren’t CGI by phreeza on Monday November 15, 2021 @02:52PM (#29231835)
Ugh I must have been half asleep when writing the original comment (toddler woke up at 4am). I mistook your comment for a knee-jerk libertarian reaction, but what you propose does make a lot of sense. I stand corrected.