[dead]
Re:Show HN: Windows 2000 on Docker
by schwartzworld on Sunday November 14, 2021 @11:41AM
(#29218299)
Using their own outdated, unsupported browser? Why should they develop websites against a 22 year old browser version?
On the one hand, it’s a sign of technical prowess to be able to accommodate browsers going that far back.
On the other, it’s kind of embarrassing not to have a barebones version of your website load in case an old browser is detected. IE5 had Ajax after all, what more does a search box really need? The answer? Endless tracking and cookies and phoning home. God forbid someone uses a browser we can’t use to collect infinite metrics.
Makes me wonder, does bing work with lynx?
Lynx is not outdated. It’s actively maintained and updated. Last release is a couple months old.
Re:Show HN: Windows 2000 on Docker
by charcircuit on Sunday November 14, 2021 @10:44PM
(#29223433)
Lynx doesn't support JavaScript like every other modern browser.
It is outdated.
In tech, we call this "opinionated".
I realize that it probably doesn’t pay, but it wouldn’t be that difficult to implement just a form to type queries and a basic html result page that works without javascript.
Re:Show HN: Windows 2000 on Docker
by calvinmorrison on Sunday November 14, 2021 @07:06PM
(#29222014)
Welcome to my Friday nightmare. Some update broke dropdowns on IE9 because, apparently plain form select HTML is no longer a viable thing because we can't beautify it. Why my erp to UPS connector needed beautification I don't know. I call, they know, everybody using IE (as required by this connector) is down. Great. Patch rolls in the morning and suddenly looks like chrome is supported.
Sigh
It certainly wouldn’t. Forms have been with us for a very long time and I’ve done it more times than I can remember.
Yes, it says that they are moving forward and not targeting browsers that are EOL.
What volumes does it speak about microsoft?
Re:Show HN: Windows 2000 on Docker
by qbasic_forever on Sunday November 14, 2021 @12:06PM
(#29218538)
I think it's ironic. Microsoft since the dawn of time has been known for backwards compatibility in Windows. They would go out of their way to ensure random 16 bit apps with bugs and major issues continued to work through years of major upgrades to Windows. Raymond Chen has written countless stories of the hacks upon hacks they had to keep running through the years: http://ptgmedia.pearsoncmg.com/images/9780321440303/samplech... So now to see it all abandoned as Microsoft is pulled into the age of web applications is kind of amusing.
And just recently on here I was talking about how MS is known for backwards compat but we actually observe Linux doing it better