Re:How do cars fare in crash tests they're not specifically ...
by kube-system on Thursday November 11, 2021 @02:20PM
(#29191954)
The IIHS is always ahead of the curve. They're sponsored by insurance companies, so they have a huge incentive to reduce injuries. (It's amazing what can be done when billionaires have their incentives align with a greater good)
But, they have no power to regulate. Vehicles that do poorly under IIHS testing are completely legal, they simply get named-and-shamed. Sometimes I wonder how lax NHTSA testing would be if it weren't for the comparison point which is the IIHS.
Re:How do cars fare in crash tests they're not specifically ...
by brigade on Thursday November 11, 2021 @05:21PM
(#29194004)
On the other hand, because they're sponsored by car insurance companies, they only care about injuries from impacts.
Like how them changing their whiplash tests caused neck pain and injuries for anyone significantly outside their test dummies. But because they're not caused by an impact, but rather because they fail cars that allow the user to adjust head restraints to be less effective for the median posture, they don't care.
Re:How do cars fare in crash tests they're not specifically ...
by throwaway0a5e on Thursday November 11, 2021 @07:06PM
(#29194860)
And they don't care about anything else. Dead people don't pay premiums.
Thankfully NHTSA has a much broader mandate.
Here's a list of current US dummies, including average males, extra small females, kids, etc:
https://www.nhtsa.gov/nhtsas-crash-test-dummies