Re:Why do companies spend so much on recruitment but not ret...
by 0des on Thursday November 11, 2021 @10:19AM
(#29188742)
We are not doing 'Mang'. Stop it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why do companies spend so much on recruitment but not ret...
by hourislate on Thursday November 11, 2021 @10:33AM
(#29188974)
If this is a game of Scrabble I got FAGMAN !
Re:Why do companies spend so much on recruitment but not ret...
by dustintrex on Thursday November 11, 2021 @10:36AM
(#29189019)
Try GANGNAM. (Google Apple Netflix GameStop Nvidia Amazon Meta, and yes, one of these is not like the others.)
Re:Why do companies spend so much on recruitment but not ret...
by WithinReason on Thursday November 11, 2021 @11:12AM
(#29189554)
How about Meta Apple Google Amazon?
Re:Why do companies spend so much on recruitment but not ret...
by spiderice on Thursday November 11, 2021 @10:26AM
(#29188849)
What does Mang mean? Not finding it with a quick google search.
Edit: never mind. It becomes very clear if you spell it right, as a sibling comment pointed out.
Re:Why do companies spend so much on recruitment but not ret...
by frgtpsswrdlame on Thursday November 11, 2021 @10:32AM
(#29188956)
You're right, 'A G-MAN' is so much better.
Re:Why do companies spend so much on recruitment but not ret...
by croon on Thursday November 11, 2021 @10:39AM
(#29189070)
GAMMA? MMANGA? AMANAM?
Re:Why do companies spend so much on recruitment but not ret...
by Rezwoodly on Thursday November 11, 2021 @10:25AM
(#29188832)
Thank you
Re:Why do companies spend so much on recruitment but not ret...
by egberts1 on Thursday November 11, 2021 @10:24AM
(#29188822)
MANG!
Re:Why do companies spend so much on recruitment but not ret...
by NullPrefix on Thursday November 11, 2021 @10:25AM
(#29188845)
MAANG - there are two A's