Re:China to supercharge uranium race with 150 new nuclear re...
by reissbaker on Monday November 08, 2021 @03:04PM
(#29153553)
Yes, the OP did literally argue that if the US had transitioned to nuclear power, global climate change would have been "minor."
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:China to supercharge uranium race with 150 new nuclear re...
by whimsicalism on Monday November 08, 2021 @03:10PM
(#29153624)
The US has been responsible for a large plurality of the emissions of CO2 into the atmosphere. China is now the largest emitter, but it's not particularly close if you integrate that function over time.
Re:China to supercharge uranium race with 150 new nuclear re...
by reissbaker on Monday November 08, 2021 @04:01PM
(#29154214)
Looking at the data, it doesn't seem like the US transitioning to nuclear would have made climate change a "minor" problem: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/annual-co-emissions-by-re...
For nearly all of the time before China outstripped the US, the EU (if you include EU-27) was a larger contributor than the US anyway. And much of the early US emissions edge came before nuclear power was invented. Global warming itself was poorly understood prior to the 1960s: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/discovery-of-glob...
A transition to nuclear would have helped, certainly! But climate change would not be "minor."