I think he might care and believes this is the best he can do from a business perspective. It is not easy to remain firm to not censor content when there are thousands of users asking you to do it. That they removed any mention of Swartz from the site was pretty low though. Wonder what their rationalizations were. That he did commit suicide? That he was adamant about free speech and against corporate censorship? Reddit seems to be a bit clumsy here.

It goes far beyond people asking them to do it. They are extremely proactive about their censorship, and most of the time they have zero justification for it.

For one example of many, they permanently banned an autistic live streamer for asking a question about how the Reddit Live algorithm works, claiming it was "harassment toward the admins." In reality, they've been brazenly and repeatedly lying to everyone about how the algorithm works for over a year, including selling ads based on grossly inflated viewership numbers -- and "grossly" is honestly a huge understatement. But folks who mention the algorithm in any negative context tend to get banned permanently, or at the very least censored from using certain words, such as algorithm, admin, mod and ban.

There is no conceivable way that spez is oblivious to all of this, so it's safe to assume that he put his stamp of approval on the behavior, either intentionally or by inaction.

When you're making as much as they're probably making, why rock the boat?

For some people, money doesn't trump morality.

Yep, but that's not spez.

Err care to explain how you can assert that?

I just read this again, and I understand what the person I responded to was saying. Yes, correct - Spez lets money trump morality.

because they aren't rocking the boat.