Re:Lightweight Cryptography
by wmf on Sunday November 07, 2021 @04:49PM
(#29143823)
That tradeoff doesn't exist. No one is proposing weak or breakable encryption. Even the fastest "lightweight" finalists provide full 128-bit security.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Lightweight Cryptography
by marcosdumay on Sunday November 07, 2021 @08:35PM
(#29145351)
If they have 128-bit security, what is the difference between that and a normal contest?
I think the difference is that the focus is on finding more efficient ways to provide the same level of security. Existing algorithms are "good enough" performance-wise for mainstream hardware, but there is much room for improvement without tradeoffs.