Re:Widespread security risk identified in phones and Bluetoo...
by gruez on Thursday November 04, 2021 @10:26PM
(#29114812)
>so that's somewhat relieving.
well not really, all that means is that the surveillance company would need to augment the dataset with other features to get an accurate result. Also, I doubt they actually care about tracking you on a minute to minute basis. Knowing that you went to the pet store with 30% certainty, 4 times this year, is enough to pin you as a pet owner and send you pet-related ads. the same applies for an oppressive government. knowing that you went to a protest 5 times this month, with 30% certainly, is enough for you to get sent to a reeducation camp, or at least send some officers to surveil you and catch you in the act.
Re:Widespread security risk identified in phones and Bluetoo...
by jnalley on Thursday November 04, 2021 @11:59PM
(#29115287)
I think at least one of the larger points being made is that compared to the title, it comes off as clickbait.
Re:Widespread security risk identified in phones and Bluetoo...
by pessimizer on Thursday November 04, 2021 @11:08PM
(#29115030)
And to track the other devices that your device was near most often.
Re:Widespread security risk identified in phones and Bluetoo...
by GhettoComputers on Friday November 05, 2021 @05:12AM
(#29116960)
Your credit card company knows all your purchases and your legal name, combined with what the ISP knows about your web browsing and google maps/cell provider with all your consistent location data, they have a very strong profile already not even including social media. This is small and irrelevant against way more advanced profiles they make with troves of your user data.
Edit: Upon reading the cited paper, the final sentence in the conclusion states that being able to track a target is "essentially a matter of luck", so that's somewhat relieving.