Re:Truck driver leads NJ Senate president after spending $15...
by sjg007 on Wednesday November 03, 2021 @07:48PM
(#29102038)
Hollow points are more destructive and dangerous to the person who was shot. They cause so much internal damage that the person will not survive a wound that may have been survivable otherwise. They are banned by the Geneva convention.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Truck driver leads NJ Senate president after spending $15...
by betwixthewires on Wednesday November 03, 2021 @08:48PM
(#29102456)
I'd like a source on that final sentence if you have it.
I get the arguments for and against them, but I generally favor leaving those decisions up to the people involved.
Re:Truck driver leads NJ Senate president after spending $15...
by sjg007 on Wednesday November 03, 2021 @08:50PM
(#29102467)
Why don’t you Google it? Easy to find.
Re:Truck driver leads NJ Senate president after spending $15...
by portpecos on Wednesday November 03, 2021 @11:55PM
(#29103547)
>It is a common misapprehension that hollow-point ammunition is prohibited by the Geneva Conventions, as the prohibition significantly predates those conventions.
There ya go. Easy to find.
Re:Truck driver leads NJ Senate president after spending $15...
by post_break on Wednesday November 03, 2021 @08:24PM
(#29102301)
Why do police use them then?
Re:Truck driver leads NJ Senate president after spending $15...
by namelessoracle on Thursday November 04, 2021 @02:18PM
(#29110694)
Because they are less likely to also shoot the person behind the person you shot.