In my experience, it’s hard to time a talk correctly, even with multiple run throughs ahead of time. Standing up in front of a big crowd, even if I’ve got a stop watch running I can end up going far too quick, or far too slowly, and end up with tunnel vision where I fail to identify and correct the mistake.
Are _some_ of the speakers doing it intentionally? Probably. Did some just fail to prepare? Almost certainly. But things come up, and in the most charitable case, they just stood in front of a bunch of people and communicated something they thought was important. I applaud them for that, and move on.
IIRC it's green while you've still got plenty of time, orange when you're within x minutes of the scheduled end, and red once you're at the scheduled end.
I've found (from Toastmasters) that a nice bright light at the back of the hall is much easier to respond to than a clock or something counting down
It’s a lot like that (probably misattributed) Hemingway quote “If I had more time I would’ve written a shorter letter.”
https://www.amazon.com/-/es/Temporizador-temporizador-magnét...
edit: ok closing and reopening amazon did the trick :)
I feel like it is not about 52.x minutes, it is more about expectations. If the talk is 20 minutes the audience expects it to be over by 20 minutes.
This is tangential to the content of the article, but ... I'm continually astonished by the number of speakers who seem to be comfortable (largely at conferences) running over time cutting into their question time, the time of the next speaker, or even worse, lunch! Presumably it's not just me and Rota who feel this way, but it seems like there must be a large contingent of people who are very easygoing about it and quite happy to overrun or listen to overrunning speakers. I would be interested to know the thoughts of other HN readers.