News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:When “Foundation” Gets the Blockbuster Treatment, Asimov’... by scotty79 on Tuesday November 02, 2021 @09:01AM (#29080555)
> Writers today seem to not understand anymore how reality works, so they aren't able to extrapolate from it.

That's a quite accurate observation. Even for the largest budgets people tasked with story telling are almost always the weakest element. Who makes them? What kind of education do they undergo to be this wrong about reality and storytelling? Are they such small and in-bred group that they are all so wrong in such similar ways?

This reminds me of another weird thing. In games, various NPCs often say the same dialog line just in different voices. So the bottleneck is writing few words? Not hiring voice talent, not recording it in the studio and postprocessing it? But writing few unique words less is where you get your savings?

Re:When “Foundation” Gets the Blockbuster Treatment, Asimov’... by mihaic on Tuesday November 02, 2021 @09:53AM (#29081222)
True, it might be that the bubble writers live in nowadays is stronger than it's ever been, and it's a guild that rejects all non-aligned newcomers. It might also be that people that understand reality go into more stable domains, to make a sure income.

Whatever the reason, we're surely becoming culturally poorer.

Re:When “Foundation” Gets the Blockbuster Treatment, Asimov’... by seanalltogether on Tuesday November 02, 2021 @10:55AM (#29082188)
Because writers don't fund movies and tv shows, and are almost always left out of the decision making process for what elements need to appear in the story.
Re:When “Foundation” Gets the Blockbuster Treatment, Asimov’... by scotty79 on Tuesday November 02, 2021 @12:08PM (#29083267)
So the problem is that writers don't write the scripts? I know directors don't actually direct them since there often is director's cut, that is supposed to reflect better the intentions of the director.
Re:When “Foundation” Gets the Blockbuster Treatment, Asimov’... by germinalphrase on Tuesday November 02, 2021 @11:48AM (#29083007)
How many actors can you name? Directors?

Screenwriters would seem to be critically important, but writing is hard, often slow and converts much less recognition than other roles in the industry. Further, there are innumerable points in the production chain in which the (necessary!) decisions of other crew members can alter/dilute/confuse the intentions of the screenwriter.

Re:When “Foundation” Gets the Blockbuster Treatment, Asimov’... by concinds on Thursday November 04, 2021 @04:08AM (#29104539)
> Screenwriters would seem to be critically important, but writing is hard, often slow and converts much less recognition than other roles in the industry

I can name Levinson and Link. Ronald D. Moore also seemed pretty great. Some writers are talented enough that they can transcend the obscurity granted by their profession, and achieve "cult status" within a small niche who cares about these things.

But frankly, it seems many writers are simply not good. Most TV show nowadays consist of central characters doing dumb things, and needing an episode or two to dig themselves out, acting as filler. Episodic formats tend to promote lazy writing and overreliance on tropes. And it seems to me that most writers watch more TV shows than they read books, given how homogeneous the average popular TV show can be.

Re:When “Foundation” Gets the Blockbuster Treatment, Asimov’... by scotty79 on Tuesday November 02, 2021 @12:05PM (#29083225)
Recently I'm learning a lot of names of screenwriters exactly because they tank show after show but they are given yet another chance by producers because one of the things they wrote was mediocre.