News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Grand jury subpoena for Signal user data, Central Distric... by strogonoff on Saturday October 30, 2021 @03:01AM (#29046657)
> This is why there should not be a single entity that runs the network. Make it fully decentralized with economic incentives for node operators.

Just make the network work based on open protocols, where anyone can run a server that interoperates with others. (Matrix.)

For the non-developer end-user, they can use one of the existing servers, who in theory could charge their users.

Yes, it would be hard to maintain branding cohesion, and the product/service would lose to a centralized service. However, transitioning to heterogenous social/messaging landscape (from current oligopolies) could make smaller services like that competitive.

IMO it’s not clear we should treat a legal/political issue with technical workarounds, it doesn’t seem sustainable.

Re:Grand jury subpoena for Signal user data, Central Distric... by olah_1 on Saturday October 30, 2021 @09:47PM (#29053799)
Matrix system sucks because the servers are branded with domain names and the server operators have total ownership of your account.

In a network like Status or Session, you don’t need to know and don’t care who runs the node you happen to be using at a given moment.

Re:Grand jury subpoena for Signal user data, Central Distric... by unnouinceput on Saturday October 30, 2021 @03:58AM (#29046939)
So what you are proposing is TOR but with a twist to charge connections?
Re:Grand jury subpoena for Signal user data, Central Distric... by DocTomoe on Saturday October 30, 2021 @06:51AM (#29047750)
Actually, what OP is proposing is federation, like e-Mail.

Some people do pay for their e-Mail providers today...

Re:Grand jury subpoena for Signal user data, Central Distric... by strogonoff on Saturday October 30, 2021 @08:39AM (#29048309)
Yes, that was the idea. Matrix does something like this for messaging.