The HTML video element needs to go back on the drawing board

Re:The HTML video element needs to go back on the drawing board by cpach on Thursday October 28, 2021 @08:06AM (#29025057)

Good point. YouTube isn’t the only game in town though. There are competitors such as Mux and Wistia.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The HTML video element needs to go back on the drawing board by chrisweekly on Thursday October 28, 2021 @08:24AM (#29025221)

Vimeo would've been 1st on my list of yt alts

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The HTML video element needs to go back on the drawing board by anaganisk on Thursday October 28, 2021 @08:13AM (#29025119)

Youtube is free vs others which are paid. And youtube is the most known video hosting service while I have barely heard of others. Are they really competitors?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The HTML video element needs to go back on the drawing board by d2wa on Thursday October 28, 2021 @08:15AM (#29025139)

Twitch is free and quite popular.

Everyone hangs out on Daily Motion, Vimeo, Cinnamon, D.Tube, and PeerTube all the time. Right?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The HTML video element needs to go back on the drawing board by stevehawk on Thursday October 28, 2021 @08:18AM (#29025165)

twitch isn't a video hosting service. it's a streaming service

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The HTML video element needs to go back on the drawing board by oarsinsync on Thursday October 28, 2021 @08:48AM (#29025442)

...with on-demand replays of previously streamed content.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The HTML video element needs to go back on the drawing board by anonymfus on Thursday October 28, 2021 @09:15AM (#29025705)

...which expire in two weeks (or 60 days if you are rich) so only few minutes of highlights remain.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The HTML video element needs to go back on the drawing board by anaganisk on Friday October 29, 2021 @03:28AM (#29036142)

Which everyone are you talking about? 99% of youtube users probably never heard of those services.

[ Parent | on HN ]