News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:There is no bottom when it comes to Section 230 reform pr... by torstenvl on Wednesday October 27, 2021 @11:42PM (#29022139)
The law generally defers to experts with recognized training and experience in the relevant field. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daubert_standard
Re:There is no bottom when it comes to Section 230 reform pr... by torstenvl on Thursday October 28, 2021 @09:56AM (#29026171)
God. This place is toxic lately.
Re:There is no bottom when it comes to Section 230 reform pr... by tata71 on Thursday October 28, 2021 @12:56AM (#29022531)
One hop to a kangaroo court, then?
Re:There is no bottom when it comes to Section 230 reform pr... by wolverine876 on Thursday October 28, 2021 @01:15AM (#29022621)
How does a court, with a judge appointed and confirmed by elected representatives, a jury of independent citizens, utilizing expert testimony and long-established rules of procedure, equate with a kangaroo court?
Re:There is no bottom when it comes to Section 230 reform pr... by CamperBob2 on Thursday October 28, 2021 @02:19AM (#29022975)
For one thing, a law like this puts a staggering amount of power in the hands of whoever gets to define "emotional injury."
Re:There is no bottom when it comes to Section 230 reform pr... by anigbrowl on Thursday October 28, 2021 @03:57AM (#29023525)
Emotional distress has been a concept in tort law for decades and the sky has yet to fall. It's generally measured as a combination of 'here's the awful thing that happened, imagine how you'd feel, jurors' and testimony from the victim and/or psychiatrist(s) assessing the impact of the emotional injury in terms of subsequent dysfunction.
Re:There is no bottom when it comes to Section 230 reform pr... by CamperBob2 on Thursday October 28, 2021 @04:13AM (#29023630)
Tort law is one thing. The US Code is another.
Re:There is no bottom when it comes to Section 230 reform pr... by kodah on Thursday October 28, 2021 @03:03AM (#29023242)
I can see this going the way of bitemark analysis.