The specific claim in the video was % of code being written by early adopters. I can't tell from the video how "early adopters" was defined or how they measured % of code so it's ambiguous. But story should have made it clear this isn't a percentage of all new code.

I hadn't seen the video quote until it was posted above: I assume "early adopters" is those who were accepted into the program and installed it, but yes it's still ambigious.

Ya, it is clearly a lie or the journalist was clueless