Re:Nearly a third of new code on GitHub is written with AI help
by minimaxir on Wednesday October 27, 2021 @03:27PM
(#29017916)
Even if you do the "% of users using Copilot" approach, Copilot was limited to both Visual Studio Code (until today) and an invitation-only program.
The fact that the combo reached 30% of newly generated code doesn't make sense.
Re:Nearly a third of new code on GitHub is written with AI help
by ghaff on Wednesday October 27, 2021 @03:45PM
(#29018181)
The specific claim in the video was % of code being written by early adopters. I can't tell from the video how "early adopters" was defined or how they measured % of code so it's ambiguous. But story should have made it clear this isn't a percentage of all new code.
Re:Nearly a third of new code on GitHub is written with AI help
by minimaxir on Wednesday October 27, 2021 @03:52PM
(#29018266)
I hadn't seen the video quote until it was posted above: I assume "early adopters" is those who were accepted into the program and installed it, but yes it's still ambigious.
Re:Nearly a third of new code on GitHub is written with AI help
by uberman on Wednesday October 27, 2021 @03:38PM
(#29018066)
Ya, it is clearly a lie or the journalist was clueless
Re:Nearly a third of new code on GitHub is written with AI help
by Bancakes on Wednesday October 27, 2021 @03:41PM
(#29018116)
Yep! I was just watching how clang-tidy can now automatically apply code fixes in realtime. Is this AI?
Re:Nearly a third of new code on GitHub is written with AI help
by lhorie on Wednesday October 27, 2021 @03:31PM
(#29017969)
I mean, Google search uses AI, and developers use Google to find things, so technically you could say the vast majority of code is written with "AI help", but that's not exactly a noteworthy observation to make...
Doesn't say how much of the new code was generated by Copilot, just that it was used in the process of writing it.
edit: I read the article wrong, skimming it. I understood it as 30% of new code written by GitHub engineers uses AI help, which sounds much more reasonable.