Re:Why is Oracle worth $260B?
by gagejustins on Tuesday October 26, 2021 @03:06PM
(#29004804)
Hello everyone, author here. I wrote this post after wondering why Oracle is such a ubiquitous name, but almost no developers I've worked with have ever used it. After some research and conversations with a former employee, it turns out that the story is really interesting: Oracle was basically the first company to commercialize a RDBMS. And today they have what might be the fastest, most performant database at scale – if you're willing to pay for it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why is Oracle worth $260B?
by hindsightbias on Tuesday October 26, 2021 @03:48PM
(#29005367)
The intersection of HN and Enterprise developers on a venn diagram, anecdata aside, is not very large.
That’s putting it mildly. Developers who don’t know about Oracle and enterprise-scale databases are like car designers who haven’t heard of Ford.
This is why HN teems with NoSQL database nonsense and ideas like 100K rows is a scaling problem.
IBM worked on an RDBMS in 1974, and Honeywell released a commercial RDBMS in 1976* before Oracle launched.
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multics_Relational_Data_Store
Re:Why is Oracle worth $260B?
by gagejustins on Tuesday October 26, 2021 @03:38PM
(#29005229)
Weird, everything I've read said the contrary, e.g. https://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/23/business/edgar-f-codd-79-...