Re:Edward Snowden Slams Sam Altman's Worldcoin: 'Don't Catal...
by ThePhysicist on Tuesday October 26, 2021 @07:59AM
(#28999270)
DRM magic inside the Orb.
Re:Edward Snowden Slams Sam Altman's Worldcoin: 'Don't Catal...
by gcr on Tuesday October 26, 2021 @08:27AM
(#28999536)
Who's to say that employees (physical orb administrators) won't be in on it?
Re:Edward Snowden Slams Sam Altman's Worldcoin: 'Don't Catal...
by user-the-name on Tuesday October 26, 2021 @09:25AM
(#29000097)
This is a cryptocurrency project. The opportunity for scamming is much, much bigger than that.
Re:Edward Snowden Slams Sam Altman's Worldcoin: 'Don't Catal...
by TechBro8615 on Tuesday October 26, 2021 @11:08AM
(#29001329)
Quality shitpost.
We’ve really come full circle when a blockchain relies on DRM to work.
Re:Edward Snowden Slams Sam Altman's Worldcoin: 'Don't Catal...
by _jal on Tuesday October 26, 2021 @11:39AM
(#29001745)
It is a thing of beauty. "The DMCA says you aren't allowed to circumvent our attack on a central pillar of the modern nation state."
Re:Edward Snowden Slams Sam Altman's Worldcoin: 'Don't Catal...
by mNovak on Tuesday October 26, 2021 @02:40PM
(#29004461)
I've got it, we need kernel-level anti-cheat...
Re:Edward Snowden Slams Sam Altman's Worldcoin: 'Don't Catal...
by Tenoke on Tuesday October 26, 2021 @07:54AM
(#28999223)
Presumably the orbs produce a verifiable type of hash. E.g. whatever output it has is also encrypted with their private key + some salt and you can always check if what a user provides has that.
Re:Edward Snowden Slams Sam Altman's Worldcoin: 'Don't Catal...
by yissp on Tuesday October 26, 2021 @08:48AM
(#28999719)
Would it not just be a matter of time until the orbs are reverse-engineered and you can sign arbitrary input? Especially if this currency were to actually gain significant popularity.
Re:Edward Snowden Slams Sam Altman's Worldcoin: 'Don't Catal...
by New_California on Tuesday October 26, 2021 @07:57AM
(#28999260)
You don't understand what a hash is.
Re:Edward Snowden Slams Sam Altman's Worldcoin: 'Don't Catal...
by ta23adesrg on Tuesday October 26, 2021 @08:25AM
(#28999514)
Your confidence in your own reading comprehension is unjustified. They are simply describing signing the hash.
Re:Edward Snowden Slams Sam Altman's Worldcoin: 'Don't Catal...
by exo762 on Tuesday October 26, 2021 @08:08AM
(#28999361)
It can be done in following way. Orb can have a baked-in private key (on hardware level). Public keys are stored in the blockchain. Each hash is signed by the private key stored in the orb.
Re:Edward Snowden Slams Sam Altman's Worldcoin: 'Don't Catal...
by gcr on Tuesday October 26, 2021 @08:32AM
(#28999583)
That's orthogonal to the point. Here's the scenario:
1. User has a "fake" biometric A, generated via GAN or [1], that's cheap and easy to produce.
2. Suppose they can present A to any orb device, generating hash(A), which signs hash(A) using its built-in private key as usual.
As long as the user can generate a fake iris biometric scan accepted by an orb, no other part of the system needs to be compromised for this attack to work.
1: http://iab-rubric.org/papers/ICPR14_1649_FI.pdf , note that liveness detection is a cat-and-mouse game
Re:Edward Snowden Slams Sam Altman's Worldcoin: 'Don't Catal...
by exo762 on Tuesday October 26, 2021 @08:43AM
(#28999669)
See my original post. It's pretty clear that process of initial distribution of tokens is not open. Volunteers are likely contributing lots of private data to the company to get their hands on orbs.
His argument is valid, what stops you from replacing the retina scan with a random hash replicating a different person scanning each time and collecting new tokens? What ties the hash to the actual retina other than the device that you can mess with?