Re:Hertz orders 100k Teslas
by bovine3dom on Tuesday October 26, 2021 @10:13AM
(#29000655)
Do you have some numbers on lower maintenance? From a quick look around [1-2] they seem pretty similar to other manufacturers.
It’s not about the cost in the charts you shared, it’s about the frequency (downtime / opportunity cost) and what’s involved:
https://caredge.com/tesla/model-3/maintenance#schedule - Hertz could easily train 1 tech at every airport to do this entire maintenance with a basic lift and simple materials.
For a Toyota Camry, this work occurs 2x as often (downtime is a big deal for rental companies) and is not easily performed without a much more capable shop: https://caredge.com/toyota/camry/maintenance#schedule
Less moving parts, less fluids…now I want a Model 3.
The reasons Hertz is considered to be getting a great deal here by investors is that EVs retain their value a lot better and are known to have much lower maintenance overhead. So, they'll get more miles out of them before they have to sell them on, get back more when they do, and be able to charge a premium for them at the same time. In a market where margins are razor thin, that's a big deal.
It's more a question of when than if their competitors will be lining up to buy some EVs. They'll have to. And then of course the next question is which one they'd be buying. The answer for the next few years is that Tesla is one of the few companies that has both product and manufacturing ready for volume production. Of course a few other manufacturers might make some nice money here too.
So, investors are thinking that Tesla could end up supplying many hundreds of thousands of vehicles for rental per year in the next few years. On top of their other business, which is also continuing to grow at a very nice pace. They'll likely need a few new factories for this but they've shown they can deliver those as well.