News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:EFF co-founder John Gilmore removed from org's Board by tpmx on Monday October 25, 2021 @06:44PM (#28994093)
And sensible people are routing around the current EFF as a response.
Re:EFF co-founder John Gilmore removed from org's Board by busterarm on Monday October 25, 2021 @07:54PM (#28994762)
I stopped giving money to them a couple of years ago and have started to become highly critical of recent stances they've taken but every time I mention this I get berated/downvoted to oblivion.

It's sort of vindicating to start seeing others feel the same way finally.

Re:EFF co-founder John Gilmore removed from org's Board by smartbit on Monday October 25, 2021 @09:48PM (#28995496)
Where do you donate your money now? noyb.eu?
Re:EFF co-founder John Gilmore removed from org's Board by busterarm on Tuesday October 26, 2021 @02:02AM (#28996923)
Software foundations. They actually do things and aren't just a bunch of activist lawyers.
Re:EFF co-founder John Gilmore removed from org's Board by alanbernstein on Saturday October 30, 2021 @10:53AM (#29049229)
Activist lawyers provide some value, no?

Can you elaborate on why you've stopped supporting EFF? I'm just curious as I've basically been a blind supporter of them for years, and this removal has reminded me that I should actually pay attention to what's going on in the organization if I'm going to donate to it.

Re:EFF co-founder John Gilmore removed from org's Board by busterarm on Tuesday November 02, 2021 @08:31PM (#29089558)
Yeah, they blatantly misrepresented a overwhelmingly-supported bipartisan bill (all opposition came exclusively from Third Way Democrats in the House, about 1/3 of the party), Register of Copyrights Selection and Accountability Act, using anti-Trump fearmongering tactics.

The Bill would make the Register of Copyrights position accountable to both the legislative and executive branches of government and selected by committee. It also established eligibility requirements to hold the position. Currently the position is appointed directly by the Librarian of Congress with no oversight (effectively only accountable to the executive, in the sense that the President can order the Librarian to select a new Register or risk the Librarian's job).

The EFF is extremely buddy-buddy with the Library of Congress and from what I can gather lobbied hard against the Bill to protect their friends from diluted political power.

It's a position that's completely opposed to principals one would hold if they wanted a transparent, accountable government. It's not a position that I thought made any sense for the EFF to support.

I challenged Katharine Trendacosta on their Activism Team who sent out the fear-mongering mailer and was given the brush off.