Re:NYT journalist hacked with Pegasus after reporting on pre...
by peanut_worm on Sunday October 24, 2021 @06:44PM
(#28982626)
man why do people even take the gamble of using a blur just use a opaque box
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:NYT journalist hacked with Pegasus after reporting on pre...
by warent on Sunday October 24, 2021 @07:48PM
(#28983037)
Life imitates art I suppose! You don't see opaque boxes used in Hollywood productions. Blur matches a popular fantasy aesthetic
Re:NYT journalist hacked with Pegasus after reporting on pre...
by qqtt on Sunday October 24, 2021 @08:58PM
(#28983453)
Opaque boxes have been issues before, when they end up being "semi-transparent" and you can up the brightness to beat them.
Safest is probably just to cut/crop the sensitive bits out.
Re:NYT journalist hacked with Pegasus after reporting on pre...
by Breza on Thursday November 04, 2021 @07:59AM
(#29106005)
This is how I get FOIA responses. Agencies just remove the pieces they don't want me to see, sometimes with a code to tell me why it was excised. I use the redaction feature built into Acrobat.
Re:NYT journalist hacked with Pegasus after reporting on pre...
by raxxorrax on Wednesday October 27, 2021 @06:37AM
(#29011442)
The information is lost if you have a flat image without any layers. You should take additional steps for other formats of course. Granted, it has to be completely opaque of course.
Re:NYT journalist hacked with Pegasus after reporting on pre...
by geoduck14 on Monday October 25, 2021 @11:39AM
(#28989050)
I've used blur in the past. I assumed it was just as secure (please don't hate me!).
I did blur over black box because the blur was less visually obtrusive