News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Message from cycling heaven: it’s not that fantastic here by Aeolun on Sunday October 24, 2021 @12:51PM (#28979642)
> Her point is that the hogging of public space by bicyclists is a problem, and that the cause is bicyclists ignoring rules and not thinking about others.

That is not my takeaway at all. And I feel like the only way you could think that were if you were already predisposed against bicyclists.

The problem the author is talking about is that there is mostly no problem at all, and therefore many people don’t think about how they can share space (because they generally don’t have to).

Re:Message from cycling heaven: it’s not that fantastic here by tdeck on Sunday October 24, 2021 @02:00PM (#28980369)
I had the same reading as you. I think this paragraph makes it clearer:

> All these conversations abroad made people reinterpret the street for what it truly is: the remaining space between houses, with all sorts of uses and purposes worthy of discussion. Public space does not necessarily exist to facilitate fast traffic.

The author is basically saying that drivers get angry because bikes are slower than cars, and that separating bike and car infrastructure 90% of the time makes drivers see bikes as an intrusion in the shared 10% of the infrastructure, because they're used to their particular speed profile being catered to.

Re:Message from cycling heaven: it’s not that fantastic here by Vinnl on Monday October 25, 2021 @04:01AM (#28985456)
Yep agreed, I didn't think the author's point got lost at all - just that the title didn't match it.