News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google digital advertising antitrust litigation [pdf] by beckman466 on Sunday October 24, 2021 @07:53AM (#28977081)
> AMP Leadership definitely did.

did they though? couldn't this be a small (artificial delay) library injected server side by some higher ups at Google?

Re:Google digital advertising antitrust litigation [pdf] by tmcw on Sunday October 24, 2021 @11:37AM (#28978900)
See page 90:

> Google ad server employees met with AMP employees to strategize about using AMP to impede header bidding, addressing in particular how much pressure publishers and advertisers would tolerate.

Re:Google digital advertising antitrust litigation [pdf] by ricktdotorg on Sunday October 24, 2021 @12:07PM (#28979194)
thank you for finding (and posting) this.
Re:Google digital advertising antitrust litigation [pdf] by brendoelfrendo on Sunday October 24, 2021 @08:28AM (#28977269)
I guess that depends: do we believe that AMP developers and leadership did this, possibly misguided by a promise from on high of “don’t worry, this is normal,” or do we believe that higher-ups were doing secret development work that went unnoticed by everyone else?

I think it’s easier to believe that the AMP team was simply naive, or willfully blind to the implications, or they didn’t care (probably all 3; teams are big enough that there’s room for all).