News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google digital advertising antitrust litigation [pdf] by mrtksn on Sunday October 24, 2021 @04:34AM (#28975950)
Fair. So far there are three issues pointed out here that I'm not happy with too.

To re-cap:

1) Sharing AMP links is weird, feels wrong and Non-AMP links are hard to get

2) Breaks Safari's reader mode

3) Gives sub-par experience for websites that provide better experience when logged in since the AMP version is always the non-logged-in version.

None of those are deal-breaker for me because AMP pages come as a search results and fast loading results are very valuable for me when skimming to find the right one. Once I find it, I can switch to the full version(but Google makes it harder and harder. maybe this should be 4.).

Re:Google digital advertising antitrust litigation [pdf] by tyingq on Sunday October 24, 2021 @08:46AM (#28977389)
The worst of AMP prior to this story, for me, was the carousel behavior. When AMP rolled out, any story you clicked from the carousel:

- Left and right swipe events were hijacked, and sent the user to somebody else's website with a related story!

- The back button would go to Google, even if you had right or left swiped as described above...that is, non-google pages were not in the history.

Then, not just carousel pages, these applied to all AMP pages:

- A very tall banner at the top pushed your content down. It had an [x] button that would send you back to the google search rather than the expected behavior of removing the banner.

- Finding the real url was 2 clicks deep

And then just the overall weird smugness about calling it an open standard. Even though the "open standard" required including a google-owned javascript file via a <script> tag, and the validator would fail you if you didn't. You weren't allowed to host it yourself.

Re:Google digital advertising antitrust litigation [pdf] by ximeng on Sunday October 24, 2021 @07:46AM (#28977035)
4) if you don’t want amp it’s an extra click (once you’ve found the non-amp link) and going back then requires two clicks