Re:Google 'colluded' with Facebook to bypass Apple privacy
by a1369209993 on Saturday October 23, 2021 @07:47PM
(#28973516)
> I don't see that they are as impactful to user experience as most other ads
Yep. Hence the comparison to mercury tilt switches.
> it feels a bit of a cheap shot to single out HN like this
Yep.
Re:Google 'colluded' with Facebook to bypass Apple privacy
by paulcole on Saturday October 23, 2021 @08:03PM
(#28973608)
If someone is entirely anti-ad, they have to be anti-ad-on-HN.
Re:Google 'colluded' with Facebook to bypass Apple privacy
by a1369209993 on Saturday October 23, 2021 @09:00PM
(#28973904)
Exactly. Sponsored posts are ads and need to go, but this is not particularly significant on either side. HN in general is no more a ad than donating money to charity for PR reasons is a ad, and it requires a considerable confusion of ideas to think otherwise. (Or a confusion of what "ad" means. FWIW, BGP address advertisments are not ads either.)
Being entirely anti-ad is an acceptable position to hold, and I don’t really disagree, though it feels a bit of a cheap shot to single out HN like this.