We also don't know the gravity of the planet. It might be 1.2g or 0.85g.
So we don't know how much lift is generated per stroke, how much lift is required, or what the speed of sound actually is on the planet.
To be used on many different imperium planets seem to imply that it operates across an acceptable range of gravities and pressures, etc.
This particular branch of the discussion was focusing specifically on the feasibility of the 'dragonfly' ornithopters operating on Arrakis as represented in the new film.
For aircraft with fixed wings for generating lift, the propellers can be small, so supersonic speed is reached only at a higher rpm, but for a helicopter there is no difference from this point of view compared with an ornithopter.
The blades of a helicopter propeller must also be able to rotate along their longitudinal axis, like those of an ornithopter, but nonetheless they are more efficient than flapping wings, because there is no dead time and no energy lost for the reversing motions, and the fatigue resistance need not be as extreme as it would be required for flapping wings.
In our universe given enough power there is probably a way to generate an opposite wave to counter the shockwave.
(Same also applies to having force fields, but the whole “slow blade” vs fast blade thing is enough to at least handwave that away)
With such a large moving airfoil there are inefficiencies. Pretending that the wing is a solid object, very quickly the tips will be moving faster than the speed of sound. At such speeds void/shockwaves start to form, radically changing everything. The root of the wing is barely moving, the tips are supersonic, and somewhere along the middle is a transition zone that moves back and forth depending on speed. Good luck designing that airfoil. (This is what makes the TU-95 Bear so loud. Its propeller tips are supersonic while the rest of the aircraft isn't.)
There is a Russian saying about helicopters: You can place every problem in all aerodynamics on the tip of a rotor blade.