Re:Eliminating gifted programs won’t make education fair
by aaaaaaaaaaab on Wednesday October 20, 2021 @06:14PM
(#28937505)
This doesn’t sound right. Can you prove this?
Re:Eliminating gifted programs won’t make education fair
by Enginerrrd on Friday October 22, 2021 @11:42AM
(#28958596)
I just ran some monte carlo simulations. Turns out I was totally wrong, at least for a uniform distribution. I now suspect it's probably true for any distribution, but I can't prove it yet.
It just seems really odd to me: It seems like because you get 9x the number of dice rolls for one group you would end up with a final distribution that favors the majority group, but that is obviously not the case. I need to wrap my brain around that one.
Re:Eliminating gifted programs won’t make education fair
by pandaman on Wednesday October 20, 2021 @09:45PM
(#28939314)
I guess he is alluding to effects of rounding up/down in small samples but those cannot be biased in one direction. Nor are they certain to happen.
If I toss 9 quarters and a nickel and count the fraction of tails that rolled on the nickel then it will be equal to 1/10 of all the tails only if all coins roll tails or all roll heads i.e. in 2 outcomes out of 1024. In half of the other cases nickel tails will be overrepresented and in in the other half - underrepresented. It's because you cannot roll a fraction of a tail.
To put this in clearer language: If I have a bunch of 100-sided dice: 90 blue dice in one bucket, and 10 red dice in another, and I roll them all and select the top 10 numbers rolled, I'll have a greater proportion than 90% of blue dice, because there are more total dice rolls in that group.