Re:Former Netflix executive convicted of receiving bribes fr...
by ludocode on Tuesday October 19, 2021 @12:41PM
(#28920178)
No, you misunderstand. If the stock and advisory role were given to Netflix as part of the deal, it would have been fine. That's not what happened here.
The benefits went to the executive directly. He asked for personal bribes to sign contracts on behalf of Netflix. He enriched himself at the expense of his employer. This is illegal.
Re:Former Netflix executive convicted of receiving bribes fr...
by jollybean on Tuesday October 19, 2021 @08:34PM
(#28925463)
It's the individual advisor, not the company, that gets the fee.
The company would generally have no interest in that kind of setup.
When the advisory board is public, it appears to be 'above board' even though it might be a conflict of interest at least it's hiding in plain sight.
Re:Former Netflix executive convicted of receiving bribes fr...
by mabbo on Tuesday October 19, 2021 @12:08PM
(#28919743)
> Like, seriously, more than half of the companies funded by YC do this. I think this is the norm more than the outlier.
Then charge them all. That will put a halt to the practice pretty quickly.
Re:Former Netflix executive convicted of receiving bribes fr...
by Taylor_OD on Tuesday October 19, 2021 @12:47PM
(#28920259)
Until YC funds a company that specializes in making shell company^2 to make sure your C suite side deals are undetectable.
You can form "customer advisory boards" which basically pay small percentages of common to early users to use the product.
Like, seriously, more than half of the companies funded by YC do this. I think this is the norm more than the outlier.