News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors by daxfohl on Monday October 18, 2021 @10:06PM (#28914086)
Still confused how 32 core M1 Max competes with Nvidia's thousands-of-cores GPUs. Certainly there are some things that are nearly linear with core count, or otherwise they wouldn't keep adding cores, right?

Edit: Found answer here. GPU core is not the same thing as a CUDA core. https://www.reddit.com/r/hardware/comments/73i3ne/why_do_app...

Re:Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors by dannyw on Monday October 18, 2021 @10:43PM (#28914317)
The desktop RTX 3070 has 46 SMs, which are the most comparable thing to Apple's cores.

NVIDIA defines any SIMD lane to be a core. They recently have gotten more creative with definition, they were able to double FP32 executions per unit (versus previous gen) and hence in marketing materials, doubled the number of "CUDA cores".

Re:Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors by daxfohl on Tuesday October 19, 2021 @12:05AM (#28914753)
Funny, all these years I've been wondering how they possibly packed so many "cores" into those things.
Re:Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors by labby5 on Tuesday October 19, 2021 @12:38AM (#28914922)
The apples to apples comparison would be CUDA cores to execution units. Basically how many units which can perform a math operation. Apple's architecture has 128 units per core, so a 32 core M1 Max has the same theoretical compute power as 4096 CUDA cores. This of course doesn't take into consideration clock speed or architectural differences.
Re:Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors by 15155 on Monday October 18, 2021 @10:41PM (#28914305)
CPU core == Cuda SM