News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors by dylan604 on Monday October 18, 2021 @06:42PM (#28912737)
On a desktop Hackintosh, I started with 32GB that would die with out of memory errors when I was processing 16bit RAW images at full resolution. Because it was Hackintosh, I was able to upgrade to 64GB so the processing could complete. That was the only thing running.
Re:Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors by jsjohnst on Tuesday October 19, 2021 @05:37AM (#28916371)
What image dimensions? What app? I find this extremely suspect, but it’s plausible if you’ve way undersold what you’re doing. 24Mpixel 16bit RAW image would have no problem generally on an 4gb machine if it’s truly the only app running and the app isn’t shit. ;)
Re:Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors by dylan604 on Tuesday October 19, 2021 @10:40AM (#28918594)
I shoot timelapse using Canon 5D RAW images, I don't know the exact dimensions off the top of my head but greater than 5000px wide. I then grade them using various programs, ultimately using After Effects to render out full frame ProRes 4444. After Effects was running out of memory. It would crash and fail to render my file. It would display an error message that told me specifically it was out of memory. I increased the memory available to the system. The error goes away.

But I love the fact that you have this cute little theory to doubt my actual experience to infer that I would make this up.

Re:Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors by jsjohnst on Tuesday October 19, 2021 @07:50PM (#28925180)
> But I love the fact that you have this cute little theory to doubt my actual experience to infer that I would make this up.

The facts were suspect, your follow up is further proof I had good reason to be suspect. First off, the RAW images from a 5D aren’t 16 bit. ;) Importantly, the out of memory error had nothing to do with the “16 bit RAW files”, it was video rendering lots of high res images that was the issue which is a very different issue and of course lots of RAM is needed there. Anyway, notice I said “but it’s plausible if you’ve way undersold what you’re doing”, which is definitely the case here, so I’m not sure why it bothered you.

Re:Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors by dylan604 on Wednesday October 20, 2021 @12:37AM (#28926810)
Yes, Canon RAW images are 14bit. Once opened in After Effects, you are working in 16bit space. Are you just trying to be argumentative for the fun?
Re:Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors by jsjohnst on Wednesday October 20, 2021 @07:48AM (#28929547)
>> die with out of memory errors when I was processing 16bit RAW images

> Canon RAW images are 14bit

You don’t see the issue?

> Are you just trying to be argumentative for the fun?

In the beginning, I very politely asked a clarifying question making sure not to call you a liar as I was sure there was more to the story. You’re the one who’s been defensive and combative since, and honestly misrepresenting facts the entire time. Where you wrong at any point? Only slightly, but you left out so many details that were actually important to the story for anyone to get any value out of your anecdata. Thanks to my persistence, anyone who wanted to learn from your experience now can.

Re:Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors by currency on Tuesday October 19, 2021 @02:31PM (#28921644)
Not the person you're replying to.

>> I was processing 16bit RAW images at full resolution.

>> ...using After Effects to render out full frame ProRes 4444.

Those are two different applications to most of us. No one is accusing you of making things up, just that the first post wasn't fully descriptive of your use case.