Interesting opinion, it doesn't change the fact that many people are still mad about Rogan's comments.
https://consequence.net/2021/10/team-terf-dave-chappelle/
https://www.foxnews.com/media/the-view-hosts-clash-joe-rogan...
It's only an issue for the media-addicted and those who fill airtime for a living.
You seriously reply with two more links to yellow journalism. I can't tell if you're trolling or not, but that's three strikes, you're out.
And as usual, you're wrong. You still haven't linked any study or non-yellow journalism that tries to objectively capture how "many" people are still mad at Joe Rogan.
>I provided a few links because you're apparently unable to use search engines.
A few links to fake news outposts that did not support your claim whatsoever. If you can't find a legitimate claim to your original statement, it can be dismissed outright. You still haven't found anything, and so you're claims are dismissed.
The original claim was that the total number of people still offended by COVID-victim Joe Rogan's comments was "none." No evidence supports that claim, so we can dismiss it outright, like you said.
I've posted evidence to support mine, your defense is a thought-terminating cliché coined by a game show host.
Oh, so you have nothing. Thanks for agreeing with me. Your points dismissed.
>The original claim was that the total number of people still offended by COVID-victim Joe Rogan's comments was "none."
Not my nor your claim. Stop shifting goal posts.
>I've posted evidence to support mine
Wrong, you've posted none such thing, as I have proven above. You still haven't supplied evidence to support your claim.
>your defense is a thought-terminating cliché coined by a game show host.
Yellow journalism predates the birth of Trump, wrong again.
https://www.salon.com/2021/10/18/tucker-carlson-joe-rogan-an...