News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Usbimager – A non-electron based alternative to Balena Etcher. Parent comment

Re:Usbimager – A non-electron based alternative to Balena Et... by kiryin on Monday October 18, 2021 @10:12AM (#28905601)
When I first heard of it I thought it was some kind of a joke on the current state of desktop software, and a rather tasteless one at that. Then it was recommended to me where I was studying...
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Usbimager – A non-electron based alternative to Balena Et... by lpcvoid on Monday October 18, 2021 @11:15AM (#28906271)
Unfortunately, Etcher is a perfect metaphor for the state of "modern" technology in general. Inefficient to it's core.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Usbimager – A non-electron based alternative to Balena Et... by automato on Monday October 18, 2021 @04:08PM (#28910940)
it burns my microsd cards way faster than dd, what do you mean "inefficient to its core"?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Usbimager – A non-electron based alternative to Balena Et... by howLongHowLong on Tuesday October 19, 2021 @08:02AM (#28917166)
Do you choose your block size when you use dd? For me, on multiple OSes and oldish hardware, $ dd if=/path/to/iso of=/path/to/disk bs=1M seems noticably faster than etcher. I suspect thats not even the optimal choice

Edit:noticed this is sort of a repeat answer, leaving it so the people saying its slow can copy/paste and try it out.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Usbimager – A non-electron based alternative to Balena Et... by lpcvoid on Tuesday October 19, 2021 @02:45AM (#28915458)
I highly doubt that it's faster than a dd with proper blocksize. With inefficient I mean that it's an Electron application.
[ Parent | on HN ]