All that is completely beside the point though, because none of it is pertinent to whether the advice to get a gun was reasonable.
I suppose for the police officer, solving the problem of "a stranger is making death threats" is to take a proactive defensive measure and arm yourself.
----
What if you were to imagine the advise from some sort of other professional? Maybe a social worker who helps victims of domestic violence ?
What other professionals would have good advice to offer the scientist ?
----
I did think it odd that the article mentioned the "go get a gun" response. Was the author's intention to drive home the point that the police were unhelpful ?
Also, increased monitoring on a vulnerable person with known death threats against them.
Also, if it were available, counseling.
So recommend pepper spray. It's less dangerous and more effective.
Bear spray creates a cloud, rather than a stream that must be accurately directed at an assailant (like, e.g. pepper gel). In a situation where the one goal is "escape, alive" bear spray is a reasonable choice for an untrained, likely panicked individual.
You may yet be right! I'm not a self defense professional. But I was not mistaken in my understanding of the products.
Bear spray is also a really crappy choice indoors. Good luck finding your phone and calling 911 in a sufficiently timely manner after that.
Not that this particular police officer gave particularly bad advice, but that this idea - that adding more guns solves public safety problems - is so pervasive and _so wrong_.
I agree with you on the points about increased monitoring and counseling.
It is legal to carry in California, at least.
Bear spray is pepper spray in a different concentration, and with a different spray pattern. s/bear spray/pepper spray/ if it brings clarity to the recommendation.