News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Governor vows criminal prosecution of reporter who found ... by bryanrasmussen on Thursday October 14, 2021 @03:24PM (#28868795)
this is a poor analogy because the IT department isn't doing something illegal, they are just doing something poorly, the proper analogy would be if you found out the mayor routinely left the special stamp that you can use to get anyone released from jail laying on the park bench he eats lunch at - do you then go around telling people hey the mayor does this or do you say hey mayor please stop taking that stamp with you to lunch because you always forget it at the park bench and someday somebody is going to use it to do bad stuff!

OR let us reverse the analogy

You find out Facebook is running an international slave trade by using their data to find vulnerable teenage girls sending them invites and then kidnapping them. Do you A) approach Facebook and try to get them to stop their practice B) alert everyone immediately.

The answer is you alert everyone immediately because Facebook in this example is doing corrupt and illegal things. There is a difference in how you should react concerning security problems that others can take advantage of and willfully committing illegal and corrupt acts.

Re:Governor vows criminal prosecution of reporter who found ... by TheCraiggers on Thursday October 14, 2021 @03:37PM (#28868948)
> this is a poor analogy because the IT department isn't doing something illegal

At what point does it cross the line into IT malpractice? I would say that not even bothering to verify the current user has the access to view what is being requested is well over that line.

When you're dealing with PII, HIPAA, etc, there should be a standard level of competence. If I go into a doctor's office with a runny nose, and they remove my liver, simply stating that they practiced medicine "poorly" shouldn't be a defense.