News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Governor vows criminal prosecution of reporter who found ... by Dylan16807 on Thursday October 14, 2021 @02:43PM (#28868239)
Browsing the different plans is not malicious. Jesus.

And the details of different plans is not the kind of confidential info that innately deserves protection. Investigating or recording personal information would be bad, but they didn't do that.

Re:Governor vows criminal prosecution of reporter who found ... by jjkaczor on Thursday October 14, 2021 @03:24PM (#28868789)
Exactly... for them to "benefit", they would have to:

Apply for jobs at the other companies with better plans, proceed with interviews, offers and then finally accept one and quit their job at their current employer... To reap the rewards of their malicious hacking...

Re:Governor vows criminal prosecution of reporter who found ... by bawolff on Thursday October 14, 2021 @03:33PM (#28868905)
More directly, they as employees could pressure their bosses to renogtiate the insurance contract.
Re:Governor vows criminal prosecution of reporter who found ... by JshWright on Thursday October 14, 2021 @04:03PM (#28869263)
It wasn't just plan details though... They accessed names, SSNs, etc.
Re:Governor vows criminal prosecution of reporter who found ... by Dylan16807 on Thursday October 14, 2021 @07:58PM (#28871951)
Not on purpose, and they didn't keep or memorize it.
Re:Governor vows criminal prosecution of reporter who found ... by JshWright on Thursday October 14, 2021 @08:29PM (#28872240)
The GP comment says "After I shopped a few other companies to see how our plans compared". That sounds pretty "on purpose" to me.

What does "keep or memorize" have to do with anything? They intentionally abused a misconfiguration to view private information.

I think it's reasonable to disagree about the ethics of that, but I don't think it's really debatable that it was intentional.

Re:Governor vows criminal prosecution of reporter who found ... by Dylan16807 on Friday October 15, 2021 @04:18PM (#28882662)
They were intentionally viewing plan information. The personal information wasn't the goal and wasn't retained.

"private" information is too vague of a term.