News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Michelin Airless by rightbyte on Thursday October 14, 2021 @01:45PM (#28867496)
There does not have to exist a solid material with the properties of a gas.
Re:Michelin Airless by bkanber on Thursday October 14, 2021 @01:56PM (#28867643)
What? I don't understand what you mean by that.
Re:Michelin Airless by OnlineGladiator on Thursday October 14, 2021 @02:22PM (#28867971)
There's no reason to assume this is a solvable problem, just because it's a new field. I remember when cold fusion was considered inevitable.

You don't actually have any reason to assume it will happen other than blind optimism.

Re:Michelin Airless by bkanber on Thursday October 14, 2021 @03:06PM (#28868569)
... you don't actually have any reason to assume it won't happen other than blind pessimism. So let's just agree to disagree.
Re:Michelin Airless by OnlineGladiator on Thursday October 14, 2021 @03:18PM (#28868723)
I love to disagree because I'm a betting man. Want to wager some money on a bet? Pick a timeline (5 years, 10 years, 20 years, 50 years) and maybe we can make this fun!
Re:Michelin Airless by bkanber on Thursday October 14, 2021 @04:28PM (#28869589)
lol. No bet. Not because I doubt my position (I see an aerogel-inspired material working out). Rather because the 50 year timeline that I would feel safe betting on is basically my end-of-life. I'm not really interested in paying out a longbets.org payment on my deathbed.
Re:Michelin Airless by rightbyte on Thursday October 14, 2021 @05:15PM (#28870223)
As he said, more or less. Sorry for being cryptic.

"There's no reason to assume this is a solvable problem"