Re:Michelin Airless
by bkanber on Thursday October 14, 2021 @01:17PM
(#28867117)
Because this is primarily a materials science problem, and we are still novices at materials science.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There does not have to exist a solid material with the properties of a gas.
What? I don't understand what you mean by that.
Re:Michelin Airless
by OnlineGladiator on Thursday October 14, 2021 @02:22PM
(#28867971)
There's no reason to assume this is a solvable problem, just because it's a new field. I remember when cold fusion was considered inevitable.
You don't actually have any reason to assume it will happen other than blind optimism.
... you don't actually have any reason to assume it won't happen other than blind pessimism. So let's just agree to disagree.
Re:Michelin Airless
by OnlineGladiator on Thursday October 14, 2021 @03:18PM
(#28868723)
I love to disagree because I'm a betting man. Want to wager some money on a bet? Pick a timeline (5 years, 10 years, 20 years, 50 years) and maybe we can make this fun!
lol. No bet. Not because I doubt my position (I see an aerogel-inspired material working out). Rather because the 50 year timeline that I would feel safe betting on is basically my end-of-life. I'm not really interested in paying out a longbets.org payment on my deathbed.