News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Michelin Airless by 8ytecoder on Thursday October 14, 2021 @01:19PM (#28867144)
Don't get me wrong - I'd expect Michelin to have done some testing to see NVH is within tolerance levels right?

Airless is really close to working for bikes. If I were commuting on a bike now I'd be comfortable going for it. The downsides - painfully hard installation, uphill resistance, ...etc. - will be worth it.

Re:Michelin Airless by bkanber on Thursday October 14, 2021 @01:51PM (#28867573)
I also want to add, since this is more of a deep auto-industry thing, that NVH testing is almost like longitudinal health studies. NVH engineers actually have charts of which specific frequencies our internal organs resonate at. For a layperson it's easy to imagine that NVH testing is just a matter of setting up a dB meter and some accelerometers to make sure things aren't bouncing around too much, but it's actually much more nuanced than that, and the engineers have to consider the long-term effects of driving in the vehicle.

One easy way to picture this is: recall your last long road trip, or airplane flight, anything more than 3 hours or so. You get so tired after those, especially considering that you've only just sat still for a few hours. But in actuality your body is making hundreds of tiny corrections to posture each minute, in response to the vibrations of the vehicle, and that literally exhausts your muscles and nervous system. Now imagine that you make that car "5% more harsh" and redo the road trip; you will feel the compound effects of that additional harshness. Auto manufacturers take NVH very seriously, because it turns out to be a pretty big deal.

My point is that even if NVH comes back OK in the lab, they still will need a good deal of real world data with test subjects representative of the 'average driver' before they can make a determination.

Edit to add: I know of at least one case where the entire drivetrain of a vehicle was redesigned due to NVH.

Re:Michelin Airless by throwaway0a5e on Thursday October 14, 2021 @02:09PM (#28867804)
And this stuff is exactly why it's a million times less fatiguing to drive a vehicle from 2020 over one from 1990, even if you control for almost every other variable by picking one that has changed minimally (i.e. a few panel vans and many medium duty trucks)
Re:Michelin Airless by ycombigator on Friday October 15, 2021 @12:25AM (#28874277)
That's a wild over exaggeration.
Re:Michelin Airless by Firehawke on Thursday October 14, 2021 @09:05PM (#28872575)
That certainly puts an interesting spin on the one time I had to ride the back of a bus from west coast to east coast. It was three days and I was physically and mentally exhausted at the end despite sleeping for a fair chunk of it.

Edit to add: Thanks for your input on this, it's insightful and interesting!

Re:Michelin Airless by chris_st on Thursday October 14, 2021 @04:40PM (#28869763)
A friend recommended I wear earplugs on plane flights, for a similar reason. He said that the constant noise stresses our bodies/minds, and lowering it makes the time more pleasant. It may entirely be placebo effect, but I find it very helpful.
Re:Michelin Airless by ElijahLynn on Thursday October 14, 2021 @07:30PM (#28871633)
Thanks for this. Is there a way to look up NVH values for current tires? I'm assuming some have better NVH values than others and they could have an effect on making the drive feel nicer.
Re:Michelin Airless by YossarianFrPrez on Thursday October 14, 2021 @02:07PM (#28867787)
This was very cool to read; thanks for such an informative comment.

I imagine this will sound naive, but I wonder why this sort of vibration can't be addressed with shock absorbers in the seats?

Re:Michelin Airless by bkanber on Thursday October 14, 2021 @02:22PM (#28867973)
> I wonder why this sort of vibration can't be addressed with shock absorbers in the seats?

Not at all naive, because it is addressed with shock absorbers in the seats; that is one of the very many tools NVH engineers use. :) But they're not 'shock absorbers' in the way you're thinking; the actual foams used in the car seats are specifically designed and selected to dampen certain frequencies. But, kind of like a speaker or headphones or even ear plugs, the dampening happens over a spectrum, and in general our organs resonate at lower frequencies, which are harder for foamlike materials to dampen.

NVH engineers view the entire road-vehicle-driver system as a huge, complex, spring-mass-damper system, and do a whole ton of partial differential equations to solve for the outputs.

Edit to add: so why not use traditional 'shock absorbers', the spring-damper kind that you're used to seeing? For passenger vehicles the answer is weight and complexity. But many trucks and tractors and so on do in fact have these.

Re:Michelin Airless by YossarianFrPrez on Thursday October 14, 2021 @06:06PM (#28870822)
Fascinating, thanks for the response.
Re:Michelin Airless by LargoLasskhyfv on Thursday October 14, 2021 @01:47PM (#28867527)
Really? There are small cans of spray which you can have easily with you. Got a flat? Look where, pull it out. Spray the foam in. Turn the wheel for a minute, look for overseen leaks, maybe, and pull stuff out of them. Turn wheel a few more times. Pump. Or use car-adapter for pump at gas station. Those stuff costs between 2 and 4€ for a can of sprayfoam, and maybe 50ct for a small adapter(sugar cube like, but cylindrical). Given the stuff Schwalbe and Continental are offering for normal bicycles, I don't get all the rage. Because a flat fixed like described above lasts about half a year, then the profile is too slick, and I change tire and tube.

Works for me. Feels comfortable and fast. Is economic.

YMMV.

Re:Michelin Airless by 8ytecoder on Thursday October 14, 2021 @02:07PM (#28867784)
You make it sound simple. It's not when I'm commuting. Even to use the sprayfoam sealers - I need to first identify the puncture and that's not always obvious. I've usually just changed the entire tube.
Re:Michelin Airless by LargoLasskhyfv on Thursday October 14, 2021 @02:32PM (#28868091)
It's my experience. In case of unidentified punctures the foam leaks out (of them), and then you can remove the splinter, or whatever by hand, maybe with a paper tissue, or tweezers from your swiss officers knife, some multitool. Dunno. I don't have that many flats. About 5 or 6 since 2005? Each one maybe a 10 to 15 minute break.

edit: Thinking about it, one could even omit the spray can because in cities there's almost always a gas station near, which is stocking that stuff. So only the small adapter would be necessary, if your valves aren't like the ones for cars anyways. I didn't do that so far because I'm often bicycling out of the city, instead of into it.

Re:Michelin Airless by djrogers on Thursday October 14, 2021 @04:35PM (#28869705)
The last flat I had involved a 3" split in the tube - ain't no slime/foam/spray can that's gonna fix that.
Re:Michelin Airless by bserge on Thursday October 14, 2021 @04:43PM (#28869816)
I just used aramid fiber lining on the inside of my Vee Rubber tires (best stuff, fuck Conti and Schwalbe), haven't had a flat yet. Better than "puncture proof" shit from Conti.

But it's probably just a matter of time before an exotically shaped piece of glass gets through :D

Re:Michelin Airless by bkanber on Thursday October 14, 2021 @01:34PM (#28867353)
Bridgestone said bike tweels were close 4 years ago, and then again 2 years ago... I won't hold my breath! :)
Re:Michelin Airless by 8ytecoder on Thursday October 14, 2021 @01:45PM (#28867489)
Tannus is the leader right now. I have tried it and I'm fairly comfortable. Again, the number of flats you get in some of the cities in the Bay Area is insane. That makes it worth it.
Re:Michelin Airless by lost-found on Thursday October 14, 2021 @04:35PM (#28869702)
Michelin is by far the market leader in tires, especially compared to Bridgestone.