I think it's pretty safe so say it's a double failure. A human abusing other humans is a failure of that first human. If there were other humans, a third party, that were supposed to protect the now-abused humans, then that is also a failure.

Just because there was no law that said "do not be an asshole" doesn't mean that an asshole is any less of an asshole.

Doing it at Bezos-scale makes it a Bezos-scale asshole problem.

This is 100% his choice and we should be allowed to get mad if we choose to at his actions and for selfishly stealing from society for personal gain.

I would only blame the government if they forced him to do this. He had free choice.

I do understand why people are mad at bezos. However, the way I see it is that the government gave bezos and others the ability to act like this.

When slavery was legal, were the individual plantation owners terrible? Yes. However, it was the lack of government protections that allowed them to continue operating. Trying to draw the distinction between bezos and other billionaires feels like trying to compare one slave owner to the next and hoping that somehow that condemnation would make them grow a conscience.

Slavery didn't end in the US because abolitionists condemned slave owners. It ended because it was made illegal through the force of law (and in the end, a civil war).

Companies abusing their employees and the tax code won't go away because you dislike them. Those practices will only stop if the law changes.

Companies are buying legislators, that's the problem.