Re:Major nuclear fusion milestone reached as ‘ignition’ trig...
by jhgb on Tuesday October 12, 2021 @03:13PM
(#28843831)
It's like a random walk, basically. Now realize that the photon has something like 700000 kilometers to go and a mean free path in the core in the range of one millimeter or so and it's kind of obvious that this will necessarily take some time.
Re:Major nuclear fusion milestone reached as ‘ignition’ trig...
by cletus on Tuesday October 12, 2021 @02:22PM
(#28843189)
So this is based on mathematical modeling. Here's one reference I found [1] that estimates 5,000 years. I know I've heard 30,000 too, which is really within the same order of magnitude.
Re:Major nuclear fusion milestone reached as ‘ignition’ trig...
by jhgb on Tuesday October 12, 2021 @03:10PM
(#28843803)
When I was younger (like three decades ago), the number I was taught was something like two million years (if I remember it correctly; I might still be able to find that book if I'm lucky).
Re:Major nuclear fusion milestone reached as ‘ignition’ trig...
by truculent on Tuesday October 12, 2021 @06:35PM
(#28845960)
To add to the confusion, I vaguely recall a number of around 125,000 years. I think it was either from "A Brief History of Time" or Jeff Forshaw's "Why Does E=mc2?".
Re:Major nuclear fusion milestone reached as ‘ignition’ trig...
by neltnerb on Tuesday October 12, 2021 @08:36PM
(#28846854)
carbon dating is really unreliable on photons.
Re:Major nuclear fusion milestone reached as ‘ignition’ trig...
by whimsicalism on Tuesday October 12, 2021 @02:30PM
(#28843268)
It's not really "the same" photon though.
I’m guessing you meant photons but this still seems amazing. Is there somewhere I can find out more about that?