Re:Pfizer vaccine immunity diminishes, can reach as low as 2...
by AndrewBissell on Friday October 08, 2021 @11:32AM
(#28800390)
The headline and link have changed from the original Yahoo News post I submitted. I can't find it now (they have since been changed to emphasize the durability against hospitalization), but it said something like "Pfizer vaccine immunity diminishes after 2 months, may reach as low as 20% after 4 months." It was too long and I tried to cut it down while preserving the most salient details in the original headline.
Re:Pfizer vaccine immunity diminishes, can reach as low as 2...
by gus_massa on Friday October 08, 2021 @11:53AM
(#28800614)
Sorry for that. I forget to include that possibility. It's still visible in the URL https://www.insider.com/pfizer-covid-19-immunity-protection-... ( to avoid the ... in HN: pfizer-covid-19-immunity-protection-wanes-reaches-20-four-months-2021-10 )
Re:Pfizer vaccine immunity diminishes, can reach as low as 2...
by AndrewBissell on Friday October 08, 2021 @12:01PM
(#28800733)
No worries. I will confess to sometimes adding "restrictions" to "due to Covid" headlines (e.g. with "Hunger increases sharply in the developing world due to Covid" I would add it), but I see that as just remedying the editorialization implicit in the originals.
In this post I'm slightly concerned by the title. The guidelines ask to use the original title, that is "Pfizer's COVID-19 protection against infection may wane after 2 months, but it still prevents hospitalization and death for at least 6, new study finds" . It's too long.
You can be pessimist and use the first part, or optimist and use the second part. Both are opinionated reductions. The OP used a sentence somewhere in the middle of the article, that is also a possibility in case the title is too bad, but in this case it's also a very opinionated choice.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28721282