100% is ridiculous.

But perhaps maybe tests like that can get people to stop referring to non-volatile storage as "memory".

I don't much agree with the RAM = "memory" thing. "Memory" colloquially is for remembering things. RAM and storage are both for the computer to remember things, so it's natural to think they are both memories. It adds to the confusion that there are "memory cards" that employ "flash memory", the same tech that powers SSDs, which is nowadays a primary way of doing storage.

If you think about it, RAM is short term memory, and storage is long term memory, no?

Is that wrong ? Often I see RAM refered as memory with nonvolatile memory being reffered as storage.

Also there are old (ferite core) and new (NVRAM) technologies that are more or less both, further blurring the distinction.

> Is that wrong ?

Yes.

> Often I see RAM refered as memory with nonvolatile memory being reffered as storage.

That would be the correct nomenclature.

> Also there are old (ferite core) and new (NVRAM) technologies that are more or less both, further blurring the distinction.

The distinction isn't based on how it's built, but the use case and volatility. Memory is volatile and only intended for storing data for actively running programs.

SSDs and NVMe drives are storage, despite them looking like RAM chips, because they are non-volatile. When you remove power, they still have the data. A mobile device's "flash memory", which despite being called "memory", is storage.

Tell IBM in 1955. "Magnetic cores are attractive as memory elements because they are small, fast, and they provide non-volatile storage."[1]

[1] https://patents.google.com/patent/US2778005A/en

In my school (3rd world country, but expensive school), we had to draw the flag of our country (stripes, circles) with QBasic in MS-DOS.

This would have been around 1997. I remember complaining because I had an older sibling at the same school, and all they had to do was draw the flag in MS Paint.