Re:The naughty username checking system used by Twitch
by marcus_holmes on Thursday October 07, 2021 @06:48AM
(#28784606)
Is that just well-known in the UK though? I've mentioned this to people outside the UK and only occasionally have they known it.
Re:The naughty username checking system used by Twitch
by pjc50 on Thursday October 07, 2021 @08:29AM
(#28785354)
Nobody outside the UK has heard of Scunthorpe because it can't make it through the filters.
(There's a ridiculously large list of innuendo place names for tiny villages: https://anglotopia.net/ultimate-list-of-funny-british-place-... )
Re:The naughty username checking system used by Twitch
by marcus_holmes on Thursday October 07, 2021 @10:29AM
(#28786719)
One of Douglas Adams' lesser-known but still hilarious works: https://www.panmacmillan.com/authors/douglas-adams/the-meani...
Re:The naughty username checking system used by Twitch
by mbg721 on Thursday October 07, 2021 @08:35AM
(#28785415)
Hey now, it's not Bielefeld. In Ohio at least, the word it's concealing is taboo enough that nobody who does know wants to explain to their more-sheltered coworkers why the situation is funny. (Clearly the filter wasn't designed in Australia.)
Re:The naughty username checking system used by Twitch
by CRConrad on Saturday October 09, 2021 @10:45AM
(#28810326)
> Nobody outside the UK has heard of Scunthorpe
The Register has lots of readers outside the UK, and it has never shied from -- on the contrary, seems it positively delights in -- blowing this stuff up in its pages.
Re:The naughty username checking system used by Twitch
by OJFord on Thursday October 07, 2021 @07:14AM
(#28784769)
I'm also in the UK, so I don't really know. I thought/assumed it was fairly well-known among software engineers, HN, etc. (not discounting the day's 'lucky 10,000' of course) but not so much by others, regardless of country. :shrug:
Fwiw, it's well-known as such, after relatively high-profile incidents involving people with that address: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scunthorpe_problem