Re:Medical Ethicist at UC Irvine on leave for challenging va...
by shlant on Wednesday October 06, 2021 @10:43PM
(#28781216)
yea considering the post opens with how he is representing people fighting for natural immunity legitimacy and how it is never stated if he has had a previous infection, it seems purposefully written to make it sound like the repercussions are from "speaking out" vs. "not following the rules" which is a common narrative from those claiming to be "silenced"
Based on this line, I think he refused to get vaccinated and they took measures that had been clearly spelled out to him beforehand. Seems a bit theatrical considering this was all entirely foreseeable.