Wow. That’s very brazen to force a PR in like that.

The apology made it sound like a small change that didn’t follow protocol. I didn’t realize it got called out as it happened and she pushed it through anyway.

What especially strange is, when you are one of multiple maintainers ... how the hack you are not communicating with them. Multiple maintainers = they need to have shared principles on the projects = they need to talk.

Ignoring this, is the strangest thing I have seen in this PR ... and a clear indicator, that this is not only about this project. This was a nuclear action by the .NET Foundation.

Yeah I cringed when I saw how she kept re-opening the PR the maintainer had closed. No respect.

Yeah, as I thought - If I were the maintainer of that project I would have had no issue with her merging that. But I also understand why PRs exist and process, so I would have said, 'yeah, cool, just don't do it again. Nothing to see here, move along.'

one thing to just merge it, but another entirely to reopen it twice disregarding what the maintainer has asked of you before forcing it. At the very least disrespectful and arrogant.

I just don't get why not drop a brief explanation on the validity of the PR? She could have so easily avoided this. Active maintainers are right to be pissed.

That extra whitespace is horrible

There's no extra whitespace, it's just in the wrong place

The diff https://github.com/reactiveui/splat/pull/778/files

I'm only having my first coffee of the morning, but I read that as Rocky from Andy Weir's excellent Project Hail Mary would have phrased it... "Anyone have a link to the PR, question?"