News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Twitch source code and customer data has reportedly been ... by PUSH_AX on Wednesday October 06, 2021 @08:44AM (#28772452)
I've never worked in this way (when I've been part of the org), is it that common? What are the benefits of making everyone fork repos vs branching off the original repo?
Re:Twitch source code and customer data has reportedly been ... by _joel on Wednesday October 06, 2021 @08:59AM (#28772586)
It's common in general open source projects where you might want to send a patch for something that you don't have commit priveleges too, but I've never seen that used in enterprises as they have central auth / groups with the users required to work on the code.
Re:Twitch source code and customer data has reportedly been ... by robjan on Wednesday October 06, 2021 @08:55AM (#28772542)
I don't think that's a common workflow within companies. In every org I have worked at, forking is explicitly disabled
Re:Twitch source code and customer data has reportedly been ... by MAGZine on Wednesday October 06, 2021 @12:19PM (#28774914)
I worked at a large gaming company and that was definitely the collaboration model.

Before per-branch controls, the only way to disable write access (while maintaining read access, pull-request privs, etc) to a repository's blessed branches was forks.

Re:Twitch source code and customer data has reportedly been ... by vultour on Wednesday October 06, 2021 @10:40AM (#28773718)
You don't have 500000 garbage leftover branches on the main repo.