Re:It takes a PhD to develop that
by CogitoCogito on Monday October 04, 2021 @01:59PM
(#28750169)
Why talk in such generalities? Look at the github repo. There are only three committers to Casey's repo. I'm sure Microsoft could manage to contact them. I'm also quite sure that Microsoft has the money to entice a commercial license if they so wish.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
> Look at the github repo. There are only three committers to Casey's repo. I'm sure Microsoft could manage to contact them.
Microsoft's attitude towards the code seems a little odd. [0]
Unfortunately the code is intentionally GPLv2 licensed and we‘ll honor this wish entirely. As such no one at Microsoft will ever look at either of the links.
Given that WSL exists I can't imagine this is a universal policy towards reading GPLv2 code at Microsoft.
[0] https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/10462#issuecomm...
Re:It takes a PhD to develop that
by CogitoCogito on Monday October 04, 2021 @06:16PM
(#28752817)
Yeah the attitude doesn’t really make any sense. How does the license preclude them looking at the code? They can even download it, compile it, and even run it _without_ accepting the license. They only need to care about the license if they decide for distribute it.
Blanket policy to prevent claims of "you looked at our code and stole $importantDetail": only let people look at code you can safely admit to using in your product.
Because the comment I replied to made the generic claim (emphasis added) “One thing to remember is that it is always possible and acceptable to contact the author of a GPL-licensed piece of code”.