Ruby removed “Participants will be tolerant of opposing views” from its CoC

Re:Ruby removed “Participants will be tolerant of opposing v... by mLuby on Friday October 01, 2021 @12:51PM (#28720766)

> For the truly terrible people, you really shouldn't need a code of conduct to kick them out.

Good point, often overlooked. Though I hear the creak of an opening door to "we just don't like you" culture-fitting exclusion.

Written policies separate, by both time and person, rule creation from rule enforcement. That disconnect gives both the policymakers and enforcers CYA protection:

  The rule I wrote wasn't intended to be used this way.
  If it were up to me… but it's not, I just follow the rules.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ruby removed “Participants will be tolerant of opposing v... by taeric on Friday October 01, 2021 @02:38PM (#28721992)

Written policies are just another way to creak that door into a culture-fitting exclusion. Often done much more heavy handedly, as that second hypothetical line of yours is as often a lie.

I get the desire to make things more objective, but as long as people are involved, it is going to be near impossible to separate that aspect from things without trouncing on people that are otherwise invisible to the ones writing the rules.

[ Parent | on HN ]