High end art is more about investing, money laundering, and tax havens then status.
Are you suggesting Twitter validates that a Twitter account owns an NFT and shows a check/badge/whatever? I also don't think that works. Whatever rare NFT you have I can go make a visually identical NFT for <minimum cost of an NFT> and confirm that I own that NFT.
I often think that I must be missing something about NFTs because they seem breathtakingly stupid. But, I've yet to find out what I don't understand about them.
There is definitely discussion happening on exactly your point, but i imagine there are options to combat the fake NFTs given that you can't fake a signature from a known public key.
Given that there are so many NFT projects I speculate that the twitter verification will only happen for a small subset though.
That's exactly how you know you've got it. The difference is that you didn't feel the heat of FOMO convincing you to dive in without an understanding.
Yes but your NFT would be deployed on a copycat (ie. replica, inauthentic) smart contract.
Basically everyone ends up ill informed.
Can you sign that NFT with the creator's private key?
That's the point of digital assets, they are fungible by definition because it's a bunch of 1s and 0s, doesn't matter which system you run it on you will get an indistinguishable output.
People spent lots of money on game skins, rare weapon. So there is a market.
When one goes to a physical conference: flair/badges serves similar purpose. NFT could be that in zoom/team/slack.
My naive way of looking at NFT: Maybe it can be used to help fund open source free software. Instead piece of art; a flair/pin/badge for showing your support for your favor projects.
do not underestimate people's vanity.